[ACT] Hahamongna Watershed Park Update: Road to a "new" (JPL) parking lot?
Meb787 at aol.com
Meb787 at aol.com
Tue Jan 20 11:10:25 PST 2009
Lori,
The west parking lot would be "new" only in the sense that it would be a new
parking lot for park users. It has been used by JPL employees for 23 years.
In 1986 it was put in during a JPL construction project as a "temporary"
lot for JPL employees with the pledge that it would be returned to open space
within five years.
JPL's use of the lot has not been a problem for the park in terms of traffic
because JPL has its own internal network of roads.
The language in the lease permitting joint use of the west parking lot by
JPL and park users is very worrisome for several reasons:
1. There is no way to get there from here! There is no way for the cars of
park users to get to that parking lot unless a new road is built through the
heart of the park - either on the Hahamongna Annex or on the perimeter
trail.
2. Once the road is built through the park, who knows how extensive will be
the development that follows? There is an extensive history of development
proposals for Hahamongna which many of you may recall. More about that
later.
3. Until JPL goes public with its parking garage plans, how do we know that
the parking garage won't reappear on the west parking lot at some later
date? You may recall that, during the Master Plan process, there was concern
that this parking garage would be used for Rose Bowl parking. That turned out
to be a well-founded concern. A technical report to the HWP Master Plan
prepared by The Natelson Company. which I only obtained recently, discusses the
use of the Hahamongna parking garage for Rose Bowl parking in considerable
detail.
I realize that JPL has a real headache in trying to find a place to park
those 1200 cars which are now parked in the east lot. Given JPL's sensitivity
to community concerns, I cannot believe that the lab would agree to a solution
which would degrade the park with traffic and new roads. They need to let
the public know what their plans are, though, to put these concerns to rest.
As Lori said, there will be much more about this in the months ahead. If
you know of anyone who is particularly interested in Hahamongna who may not be
on the lists, could you please email me his/her name?
I couldn't agree with Lori more that this is about the future. This is our
chance to keep a few acres rustic and natural so that others may enjoy the
birds, the wildlife, the hikes and rides, all that we have been privileged to
enjoy. The challenge will be to overcome a development mentality that sees
every bit of open space only in terms of the short-term problems which it can
solve - a mentality that sees no land as off limits no matter how special it
may be and no matter how much and how long the community has insisted that it
be protected.
We need your help.
Mary B.
In a message dated 1/19/2009 7:04:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
gaboon at sbcglobal.net writes:
*Available for cross-posting...
Dear Neighbors, Trail Users & Those Who Care About Hahamongna Watershed Park,
As the protracted and arcane planning for the future of Hahamongna Watershed
Park (HWP) proceeds with the City of Pasadena, there have been numerous
public workshops, advisory committee meetings, a major "charette" and so forth. I
have reported on only a few, but suffice to say that "public input fatigue"
set in long ago among those stubborn souls who have attempted to follow the
entire "process" over the many years.
It is time to bring a new matter to your attention.
After repeated and overwhelming opposition from community participants to
Pasadena's plans to build additional parking lots and a new vehicular road
within this natural wildland park, Pasadena continues to work towards such a road
while no one is looking. Most recently, the Pasadena City Council, at its 12
January 2009 meeting, approved an amendment to the City's lease with JPL
that includes public use of what is currently a JPL-only (within the Lab)
parking lot on the west side of the HWP. For the public to access that parking lot
from outside JPL, a new road would need to be built across the park, per
prior plans opposed by the park users.
More information about the ACT
mailing list